Skip to Content
Main content

PS 196 GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

349
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

24

6%

LEVEL 3

157

41%

LEVEL 4

192

51%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

344
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

35

9%

LEVEL 3

146

38%

LEVEL 4

198

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

82

40%

LEVEL 4

115

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

125

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

75

44%

LEVEL 4

77

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

69

42%

LEVEL 4

73

45%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

15

50%

LEVEL 4

14

47%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

19

56%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

136
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

93

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

131
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

85

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

72

48%

LEVEL 4

66

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

68

42%

LEVEL 4

78

48%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

23

55%

LEVEL 4

14

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

20

56%

LEVEL 4

14

39%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

20

6%

LEVEL 3

143

40%

LEVEL 4

190

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

28

8%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

197

55%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

14

61%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

13

57%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

275
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

18

6%

LEVEL 3

115

39%

LEVEL 4

160

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

258
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

25

9%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

160

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

42

51%

LEVEL 4

32

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

48

50%

LEVEL 4

38

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.