Skip to Content
Main content

PS 206 HORACE HARDING SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

73

29%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

96

38%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

55

41%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

46

35%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

41

35%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

32

27%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

39

32%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

50

41%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

20

42%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

27

51%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

28

39%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

23

31%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

25

33%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

12

25%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

17

43%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

17

21%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

28

36%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

47

21%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

85

38%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

94

42%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

20

65%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

20

69%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

74

42%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

97
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

80

42%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

37

49%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

32

49%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

19

41%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

23

42%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

62

30%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

63

32%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

103
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

64

26%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.