PS 220 EDWARD MANDEL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

84

27%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

68

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

79

24%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

39

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

45

30%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

40

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

69
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

35

32%

LEVEL 4

34

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

33

31%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

38

31%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

17

29%

LEVEL 2

23

39%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

28

40%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

65

23%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

68

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

19

58%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

22

51%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

141
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

68

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

158
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

100

38%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

39

59%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

38

57%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

26

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

40

43%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

76

32%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

145
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

73

25%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

68

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

158
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.