PS 174 WILLIAM SIDNEY MOUNT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

68

23%

LEVEL 3

109

37%

LEVEL 4

87

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

62

20%

LEVEL 3

120

39%

LEVEL 4

92

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

55

40%

LEVEL 4

45

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

57

36%

LEVEL 4

54

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

42

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

63

41%

LEVEL 4

38

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

79
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

36

36%

LEVEL 4

43

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

82
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

43

43%

LEVEL 4

39

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

39

41%

LEVEL 4

24

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

41

39%

LEVEL 4

26

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

15

21%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

29

35%

LEVEL 4

18

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

85

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

114

42%

LEVEL 4

90

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

19

51%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

192
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

105

39%

LEVEL 4

87

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

206
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

114

40%

LEVEL 4

92

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

15

58%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

73

40%

LEVEL 4

63

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

86

44%

LEVEL 4

65

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

27

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

193
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

86

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

207
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

61

20%

LEVEL 3

118

39%

LEVEL 4

89

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.