Skip to Content
Main content

PS 182 SAMANTHA SMITH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

87

23%

LEVEL 2

144

38%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

93

26%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

109

31%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

52
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

37

37%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

37

40%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

66

30%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

124

40%

LEVEL 3

106

34%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

104

36%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

38

60%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

34

48%

LEVEL 2

32

45%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

124
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

122
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

95

38%

LEVEL 3

97

38%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

50

42%

LEVEL 2

47

40%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

58

55%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

85

23%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

135
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

131

39%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

81

25%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.