PS 161 ARTHUR ASHE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

119

39%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

124

42%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

51

36%

LEVEL 4

33

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

65

45%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

68

41%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

59

40%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

22
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

120
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

123
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

85

43%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

10

53%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

18

38%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

110

42%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

116

45%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

171
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

112

39%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

170
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

120

44%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

26

50%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

21

47%

LEVEL 4

13

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

103

42%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

116

39%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

169
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

120

43%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.