CATHERINE & COUNT BASIE MS 72 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

147

43%

LEVEL 2

121

35%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

112

38%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

58

35%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

89

50%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

68

47%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

16

52%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

99

43%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

77

39%

LEVEL 2

74

38%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

21

44%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

92

35%

LEVEL 2

99

38%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

70

30%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

55

70%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

42

67%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

74
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

133

41%

LEVEL 2

116

36%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

98

35%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

14

88%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

25

39%

LEVEL 2

23

36%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

22

41%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

122

44%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

100

41%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

67
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

131

43%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

92

35%

LEVEL 2

99

38%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

16

43%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

20

57%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.