Skip to Content
Main content

PS 80 THURGOOD MARSHALL MAGNET GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

96

40%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

30

24%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

35

31%

LEVEL 2

46

41%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

30

34%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

74
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

86

41%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

53

29%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

27

57%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

24

65%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

85
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

93

39%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

25

45%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

14

24%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

46

30%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

84

39%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

55

29%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

8

28%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.