PS 82 HAMMOND GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

94

29%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

96

30%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

58

35%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

57

33%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

33

38%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

69

34%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

76

37%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

66

25%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

28

50%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

30

48%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

119
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

84

37%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

113
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

79

39%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

52

57%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

65

57%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

23

35%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

19

33%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

120
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

80

28%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

114
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

81

28%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.