PS 86 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

117

23%

LEVEL 2

146

29%

LEVEL 3

162

32%

LEVEL 4

80

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

97

23%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

59

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

70

30%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

155
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

99

40%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

136
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

92

41%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

18

44%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

58

33%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

49

33%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

149

36%

LEVEL 4

80

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

114

32%

LEVEL 3

134

38%

LEVEL 4

60

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

53

60%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

48

65%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

210
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

132

36%

LEVEL 4

78

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

197
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

89

26%

LEVEL 3

137

41%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

68

50%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

47

49%

LEVEL 2

41

43%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

22

22%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

35

35%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

15

18%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

30

36%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

95

23%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

114

33%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

227
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

151

33%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

197
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

85

22%

LEVEL 2

113

29%

LEVEL 3

138

35%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

27

50%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

17

47%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.