JHS 8 RICHARD S GROSSLEY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

105

34%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

134

38%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

41

27%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

64

41%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

87

49%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

17

30%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

25

36%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

63

45%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

26

39%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

36

40%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

70

27%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

35

70%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

47

81%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

96
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

81

30%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

119
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

103

33%

LEVEL 2

88

28%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

24

73%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

31

74%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

110

36%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

92
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

88

32%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

111

35%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

17

55%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

23

64%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.