PS 90 HORACE MANN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

73

19%

LEVEL 2

145

37%

LEVEL 3

136

35%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

131

36%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

71

38%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

43

22%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

41

24%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

60

35%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

71
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

54

42%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

74
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

25

20%

LEVEL 3

50

40%

LEVEL 4

24

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

88

42%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

120

38%

LEVEL 3

121

38%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

118

40%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

31

43%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

29

45%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

166
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

132

41%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

159
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

116

41%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

40

49%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

70

22%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

164
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

161
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

64

19%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

14

47%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.