Skip to Content
Main content

PS 207 ROCKWOOD PARK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

135

35%

LEVEL 4

79

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

127

35%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

76

39%

LEVEL 4

56

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

70

38%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

67

36%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

10

63%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

19

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

125

39%

LEVEL 4

78

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

114

40%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

25

42%

LEVEL 2

24

40%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

33

45%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

89

38%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

54

40%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.