Skip to Content
Main content

PS 65 RAYMOND YORK ES GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

80

36%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

78

36%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

37

37%

LEVEL 4

33

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

37

34%

LEVEL 4

19

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

23

20%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

41

35%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

15
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

7

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

33

41%

LEVEL 4

17

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

52
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

33

43%

LEVEL 4

19

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

20

20%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

34

34%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

22

22%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

35

34%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

74

41%

LEVEL 4

46

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

71

41%

LEVEL 4

44

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

18

43%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

21

48%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

77

38%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

119
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

74

37%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

21

34%

LEVEL 4

12

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

62

37%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

57

37%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

122
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

78

36%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

116
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.