Skip to Content
Main content

PS/MS 42 R VERNAM GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

183

47%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

165

47%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

70

39%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

75

42%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

113

54%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

90

51%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

132

47%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

118

49%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

40

44%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

36

43%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

92

34%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

80

33%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

91

76%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

85

78%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

68
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

178

47%

LEVEL 2

131

35%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

154

46%

LEVEL 2

103

31%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

179

48%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

54

14%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

159

47%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

157

47%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

149

48%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

26

49%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

16

40%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.