Skip to Content
Main content

PS 41 CROCHERON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

32

13%

LEVEL 3

89

37%

LEVEL 4

107

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

78

36%

LEVEL 4

101

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

45

37%

LEVEL 4

65

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

64

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

44

38%

LEVEL 4

42

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

41

42%

LEVEL 4

37

38%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

105
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

46

38%

LEVEL 4

59

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

94
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

61

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

25

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

22

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

18

38%

LEVEL 4

17

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

19

44%

LEVEL 4

14

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

82

39%

LEVEL 4

105

50%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

98

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

14

47%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

177
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

20

10%

LEVEL 3

77

37%

LEVEL 4

100

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

56

39%

LEVEL 4

73

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

66

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

34

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

31

39%

LEVEL 4

35

44%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

190
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

85

37%

LEVEL 4

105

46%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

98

47%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.