JAMES J AMBROSE SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

70

21%

LEVEL 3

134

39%

LEVEL 4

121

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

126

37%

LEVEL 4

143

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

68

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

62

38%

LEVEL 4

72

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

71

43%

LEVEL 4

53

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

71

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

6

75%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

191
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

102

42%

LEVEL 4

89

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

202
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

32

13%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

111

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

12

48%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

14

58%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

129

43%

LEVEL 4

119

39%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

42

14%

LEVEL 3

116

38%

LEVEL 4

141

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

23

62%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

253
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

65

20%

LEVEL 3

132

40%

LEVEL 4

121

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

268
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

48

14%

LEVEL 3

125

37%

LEVEL 4

143

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

75

39%

LEVEL 4

79

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

97

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

59

40%

LEVEL 4

42

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

51

38%

LEVEL 4

46

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

266
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

51

15%

LEVEL 3

123

36%

LEVEL 4

143

42%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.