Skip to Content
Main content

PS 29 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

84

25%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

68

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

114

35%

LEVEL 4

63

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

62

40%

LEVEL 4

39

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

59

37%

LEVEL 4

37

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

72
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

37

36%

LEVEL 4

35

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

58
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

29

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

53

27%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

99
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

75

38%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

64

23%

LEVEL 3

108

39%

LEVEL 4

67

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

107

39%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

36

57%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

29

52%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

168
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

100

39%

LEVEL 4

68

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

164
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

101

40%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

42

54%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

36

49%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

10

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

24

46%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

68

23%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

102

34%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

174
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

68

21%

LEVEL 2

81

25%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

66

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

166
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.