PS 32 STATE STREET GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

34

8%

LEVEL 2

82

19%

LEVEL 3

173

40%

LEVEL 4

141

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

91

21%

LEVEL 3

163

38%

LEVEL 4

131

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

82

38%

LEVEL 4

89

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

167
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

91

43%

LEVEL 4

76

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

91

43%

LEVEL 4

52

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

247
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

51

16%

LEVEL 3

131

42%

LEVEL 4

116

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

227
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

58

19%

LEVEL 3

124

41%

LEVEL 4

103

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

20

50%

LEVEL 4

10

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

13

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

18

27%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

67

17%

LEVEL 3

161

41%

LEVEL 4

139

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

73

19%

LEVEL 3

154

41%

LEVEL 4

130

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

23

45%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

308
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

64

17%

LEVEL 3

167

43%

LEVEL 4

141

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

287
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

83

21%

LEVEL 3

157

40%

LEVEL 4

130

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

22

48%

LEVEL 2

18

39%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

57

44%

LEVEL 4

56

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

62

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

116

39%

LEVEL 4

85

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

108

38%

LEVEL 4

69

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

311
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

81

19%

LEVEL 3

171

40%

LEVEL 4

140

33%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

292
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

90

21%

LEVEL 3

161

38%

LEVEL 4

131

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.