Skip to Content
Main content

PS 128 LORRAINE TUZZO-JUNIPER VALLEY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

494
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

45

7%

LEVEL 2

103

16%

LEVEL 3

228

36%

LEVEL 4

266

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

478
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

45

7%

LEVEL 2

115

18%

LEVEL 3

192

30%

LEVEL 4

286

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

268
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

49

15%

LEVEL 3

104

32%

LEVEL 4

164

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

267
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

45

14%

LEVEL 3

104

32%

LEVEL 4

163

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

226
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

124

40%

LEVEL 4

102

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

211
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

70

23%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

123

40%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

8

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

9

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

397
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

64

13%

LEVEL 3

181

37%

LEVEL 4

216

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

381
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

77

16%

LEVEL 3

147

30%

LEVEL 4

234

48%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

40

33%

LEVEL 4

37

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

41

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

471
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

19

3%

LEVEL 2

66

12%

LEVEL 3

208

37%

LEVEL 4

263

47%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

458
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

80

14%

LEVEL 3

175

31%

LEVEL 4

283

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

26

30%

LEVEL 2

37

43%

LEVEL 3

20

23%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

25

31%

LEVEL 2

35

44%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

492
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

100

16%

LEVEL 3

227

36%

LEVEL 4

265

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

477
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

37

6%

LEVEL 2

112

18%

LEVEL 3

191

31%

LEVEL 4

286

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

347
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

57

13%

LEVEL 3

148

34%

LEVEL 4

199

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

380
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

76

16%

LEVEL 3

146

30%

LEVEL 4

234

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

80

38%

LEVEL 4

67

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

52

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

488
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

45

7%

LEVEL 2

101

16%

LEVEL 3

225

35%

LEVEL 4

263

41%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

472
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

44

7%

LEVEL 2

112

18%

LEVEL 3

190

30%

LEVEL 4

282

45%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.