PS 143 LOUIS ARMSTRONG GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

340

43%

LEVEL 2

273

35%

LEVEL 3

134

17%

LEVEL 4

40

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 709

LEVEL 1

286

40%

LEVEL 2

240

34%

LEVEL 3

154

22%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

168

43%

LEVEL 2

128

33%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

132

37%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

172

44%

LEVEL 2

145

37%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

154

43%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

153
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

322

44%

LEVEL 2

254

35%

LEVEL 3

117

16%

LEVEL 4

36

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

162
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

274

41%

LEVEL 2

226

34%

LEVEL 3

140

21%

LEVEL 4

22

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

202

34%

LEVEL 2

235

39%

LEVEL 3

123

21%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

152

29%

LEVEL 2

203

38%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

138

73%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

134

75%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

152
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

136

30%

LEVEL 2

158

35%

LEVEL 3

114

26%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

75

20%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

135

36%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

204

60%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

20

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

19
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

211

63%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

19

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 761

LEVEL 1

327

43%

LEVEL 2

267

35%

LEVEL 3

129

17%

LEVEL 4

38

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

275

41%

LEVEL 2

226

33%

LEVEL 3

151

22%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

159
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

304

44%

LEVEL 2

231

33%

LEVEL 3

123

18%

LEVEL 4

36

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

260

40%

LEVEL 2

219

34%

LEVEL 3

144

22%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

36

39%

LEVEL 2

42

45%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

26

45%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.