PS/IS 87 MIDDLE VILLAGE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

57

37%

LEVEL 4

36

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

63

43%

LEVEL 4

38

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

48

36%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

54

48%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

60

38%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

101

41%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

108

44%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

33

48%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

30

48%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

159
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

110

38%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

171
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

58

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

47

38%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

63

44%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

159
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

111

36%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

176
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.