Skip to Content
Main content

PS 89 JOSE PERALTA SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

438
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 989

LEVEL 1

209

21%

LEVEL 2

342

35%

LEVEL 3

306

31%

LEVEL 4

132

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

459
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 916

LEVEL 1

168

18%

LEVEL 2

289

32%

LEVEL 3

354

39%

LEVEL 4

105

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

247
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

81

17%

LEVEL 2

156

32%

LEVEL 3

161

33%

LEVEL 4

86

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

256
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

81

17%

LEVEL 2

139

29%

LEVEL 3

191

40%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

191
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

128

25%

LEVEL 2

186

37%

LEVEL 3

145

29%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

203
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

87

20%

LEVEL 2

150

34%

LEVEL 3

163

37%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

130
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

76

38%

LEVEL 4

54

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

142
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

93

48%

LEVEL 4

49

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

9

56%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

8

62%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

287
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 761

LEVEL 1

187

25%

LEVEL 2

287

38%

LEVEL 3

214

28%

LEVEL 4

73

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

302
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 702

LEVEL 1

155

22%

LEVEL 2

245

35%

LEVEL 3

250

36%

LEVEL 4

52

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

418
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 820

LEVEL 1

136

17%

LEVEL 2

266

32%

LEVEL 3

286

35%

LEVEL 4

132

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

434
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

112

14%

LEVEL 2

231

30%

LEVEL 3

330

42%

LEVEL 4

104

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

73

43%

LEVEL 2

76

45%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

56

40%

LEVEL 2

58

42%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

389
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

55

9%

LEVEL 2

161

27%

LEVEL 3

261

43%

LEVEL 4

128

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

402
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

142

24%

LEVEL 3

300

51%

LEVEL 4

102

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

154

40%

LEVEL 2

181

47%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

128

39%

LEVEL 2

147

44%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

67

37%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

85

43%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

339
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 807

LEVEL 1

183

23%

LEVEL 2

285

35%

LEVEL 3

239

30%

LEVEL 4

100

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

343
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 717

LEVEL 1

132

18%

LEVEL 2

242

34%

LEVEL 3

269

38%

LEVEL 4

74

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

427
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 958

LEVEL 1

198

21%

LEVEL 2

333

35%

LEVEL 3

298

31%

LEVEL 4

129

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

431
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 852

LEVEL 1

159

19%

LEVEL 2

262

31%

LEVEL 3

331

39%

LEVEL 4

100

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

27

42%

LEVEL 3

23

36%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.