Skip to Content
Main content

PS 91 RICHARD ARKWRIGHT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

65

21%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

110

36%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

65

43%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

50

39%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

51

39%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

53

36%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

92

42%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

103

46%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

49

55%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

42

54%

LEVEL 2

28

36%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

125
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

57

21%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

145
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

105

39%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

16

44%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

40

44%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

42

40%

LEVEL 4

22

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

50

25%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

145
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.