Skip to Content
Main content

PS 7 LOUIS F SIMEONE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

110

50%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

351
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

100

16%

LEVEL 2

181

29%

LEVEL 3

244

39%

LEVEL 4

107

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

59

57%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

187
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

135

45%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

44

39%

LEVEL 3

51

45%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

55

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

93
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

81

60%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

238
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

157

43%

LEVEL 4

81

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

20

25%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

63

25%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

105

56%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

334
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

152

28%

LEVEL 3

227

42%

LEVEL 4

107

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

17

59%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

48

51%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

100
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

86

65%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

309
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

93

22%

LEVEL 3

205

47%

LEVEL 4

104

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

43

50%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

70

35%

LEVEL 2

88

44%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

43

45%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

99

51%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

292
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

91

17%

LEVEL 2

154

29%

LEVEL 3

201

37%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

102

52%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

340
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

91

15%

LEVEL 2

176

29%

LEVEL 3

237

39%

LEVEL 4

103

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.