Skip to Content
Main content

PS 68 CAMBRIDGE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

84

30%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

57

38%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

111
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

73

30%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

79

36%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

48

60%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

50

70%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

124
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

104
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

22

44%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

28

67%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

21

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

31

35%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

59

27%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

67

35%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

126
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

101
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.