Skip to Content
Main content

JOSEPH F QUINN IS 77 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 924

LEVEL 1

264

29%

LEVEL 2

345

37%

LEVEL 3

204

22%

LEVEL 4

111

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 828

LEVEL 1

265

32%

LEVEL 2

286

35%

LEVEL 3

170

21%

LEVEL 4

107

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

104

23%

LEVEL 2

173

39%

LEVEL 3

103

23%

LEVEL 4

68

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

103

25%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

160

34%

LEVEL 2

172

36%

LEVEL 3

101

21%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

162

38%

LEVEL 2

147

35%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

23

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

24

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

217
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

222

31%

LEVEL 2

279

39%

LEVEL 3

147

20%

LEVEL 4

70

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

199
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

225

34%

LEVEL 2

230

35%

LEVEL 3

129

20%

LEVEL 4

70

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

136

19%

LEVEL 2

272

39%

LEVEL 3

184

26%

LEVEL 4

109

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 629

LEVEL 1

141

22%

LEVEL 2

230

37%

LEVEL 3

156

25%

LEVEL 4

102

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

128

57%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

124

62%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

307
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 735

LEVEL 1

135

18%

LEVEL 2

293

40%

LEVEL 3

197

27%

LEVEL 4

110

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

273
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

145

21%

LEVEL 2

258

38%

LEVEL 3

167

25%

LEVEL 4

106

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

129

68%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

120

79%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

18

27%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

18

24%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

285
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 857

LEVEL 1

252

29%

LEVEL 2

320

37%

LEVEL 3

186

22%

LEVEL 4

99

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 752

LEVEL 1

247

33%

LEVEL 2

260

35%

LEVEL 3

151

20%

LEVEL 4

94

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

292
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 868

LEVEL 1

252

29%

LEVEL 2

324

37%

LEVEL 3

191

22%

LEVEL 4

101

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

259
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 780

LEVEL 1

250

32%

LEVEL 2

271

35%

LEVEL 3

157

20%

LEVEL 4

102

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.