Skip to Content
Main content

PS 81 JEAN PAUL RICHTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

47

38%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

70

43%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

59

41%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

89

37%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

25

34%

LEVEL 2

39

53%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

27

39%

LEVEL 2

29

41%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

103
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

98

40%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

21

32%

LEVEL 2

29

44%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

20

31%

LEVEL 2

27

42%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

21

46%

LEVEL 3

16

35%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

106
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

88

34%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

96
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

16

30%

LEVEL 2

24

45%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.