Skip to Content
Main content

MEDGAR EVERS COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

43

13%

LEVEL 3

113

33%

LEVEL 4

184

53%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

340
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

58

14%

LEVEL 3

151

36%

LEVEL 4

189

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

163
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

11%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

111

60%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

115

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

73

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

30

15%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

74

37%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

9

69%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

8

73%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

263
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

38

12%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

161

53%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

295
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

50

14%

LEVEL 3

132

36%

LEVEL 4

163

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

7

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

35

32%

LEVEL 4

61

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

68

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

33

14%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

123

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

42

14%

LEVEL 3

109

37%

LEVEL 4

121

41%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

288
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

41

12%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

180

54%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

324
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

57

14%

LEVEL 3

146

36%

LEVEL 4

178

44%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

11

65%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.