BOERUM HILL SCHOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

87

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

63

18%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

121

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

45

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

25

15%

LEVEL 3

60

35%

LEVEL 4

67

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

42

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

54

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

9

39%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

15

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

54

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

25

15%

LEVEL 3

68

40%

LEVEL 4

72

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

21

29%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

16

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

26

43%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

17

26%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

14

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

85

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

103

34%

LEVEL 4

118

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

26

51%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

19

42%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

161
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

87

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

235
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

61

18%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

121

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

14

67%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

11

79%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

72

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

40

17%

LEVEL 3

89

37%

LEVEL 4

103

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

41

33%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

37

36%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

157
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

86

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

229
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

60

18%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

117

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.