JHS 162 WILLOUGHBY (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

105

32%

LEVEL 2

135

41%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

98

32%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

67

41%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

47

34%

LEVEL 2

58

41%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

63

24%

LEVEL 2

115

44%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

69

28%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

42

61%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

29

48%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

88
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

127

46%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

104

40%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

46

84%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

36

82%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

8

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

92

31%

LEVEL 2

125

42%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

91

34%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

127

43%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

87
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

75

28%

LEVEL 2

102

39%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.