JHS 383 PHILIPPA SCHUYLER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

532
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 808

LEVEL 1

78

10%

LEVEL 2

198

25%

LEVEL 3

325

40%

LEVEL 4

207

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

500
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 821

LEVEL 1

98

12%

LEVEL 2

223

27%

LEVEL 3

282

34%

LEVEL 4

218

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

306
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

88

21%

LEVEL 3

180

43%

LEVEL 4

126

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

273
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

106

26%

LEVEL 3

156

38%

LEVEL 4

117

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

226
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

110

28%

LEVEL 3

145

38%

LEVEL 4

81

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

227
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

101

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

20

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

21

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

202
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

128

45%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

192
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

79

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

274
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

126

28%

LEVEL 3

173

38%

LEVEL 4

101

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

251
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

76

16%

LEVEL 2

140

30%

LEVEL 3

142

30%

LEVEL 4

109

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

523
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 724

LEVEL 1

27

4%

LEVEL 2

174

24%

LEVEL 3

317

44%

LEVEL 4

206

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

495
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 735

LEVEL 1

41

6%

LEVEL 2

199

27%

LEVEL 3

279

38%

LEVEL 4

216

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

51

61%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

57

66%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

530
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 772

LEVEL 1

51

7%

LEVEL 2

191

25%

LEVEL 3

323

42%

LEVEL 4

207

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

500
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

66

8%

LEVEL 2

212

27%

LEVEL 3

282

36%

LEVEL 4

218

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

27

75%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

32

74%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

55

40%

LEVEL 4

50

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

59

39%

LEVEL 4

45

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

427
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 672

LEVEL 1

72

11%

LEVEL 2

173

26%

LEVEL 3

270

40%

LEVEL 4

157

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

396
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

88

13%

LEVEL 2

187

28%

LEVEL 3

223

33%

LEVEL 4

173

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

517
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 786

LEVEL 1

75

10%

LEVEL 2

194

25%

LEVEL 3

313

40%

LEVEL 4

204

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

482
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 795

LEVEL 1

98

12%

LEVEL 2

215

27%

LEVEL 3

272

34%

LEVEL 4

210

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

12

55%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.