Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 384 FRANCES E CARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

106

36%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

117

40%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

42

29%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

43

32%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

64

43%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

74

48%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

95

36%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

106

41%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

37

67%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

40

66%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

76
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

73

33%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

46

67%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

44

67%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

98

38%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

102

42%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

105

39%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

20

53%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.