Skip to Content
Main content

IS 349 MATH, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

107

37%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

105

34%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

72

47%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

67

45%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

99

38%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

97

36%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

68

28%

LEVEL 2

98

41%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

39

78%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

41

75%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

64

28%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

100
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

61

25%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

43

69%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

44

71%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

104

36%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

104

35%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

67
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

91

37%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

87
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

90

34%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

16

38%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

15

34%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.