PS 184 NEWPORT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

104

37%

LEVEL 2

131

46%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

146

49%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

74

51%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

70

43%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

64

46%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

76

56%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

64

32%

LEVEL 2

103

52%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

98

47%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

35

45%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

42

51%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

67

30%

LEVEL 2

111

50%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

89

40%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

37

60%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

57

73%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

93

34%

LEVEL 2

128

47%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

52
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

134

47%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

11

79%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

12

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

96

37%

LEVEL 2

121

46%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

83

35%

LEVEL 2

110

47%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

114

47%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

21

44%

LEVEL 2

21

44%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

32

56%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.