GREGORY JOCKO JACKSON-SPORTS-ARTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

117

39%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

48

39%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

57

35%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

26

41%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

60

43%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

26

45%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

74

38%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

29

37%

LEVEL 2

28

36%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

32

34%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

55

66%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

97

36%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

29
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

44

38%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

112

40%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

103

38%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

29
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

44

41%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.