Skip to Content
Main content

PS 255 BARBARA REING SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

85

20%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

139

32%

LEVEL 4

86

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

71

17%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

136

32%

LEVEL 4

89

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

48

23%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

50

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

46

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

42

20%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

51
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

18

19%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

32

33%

LEVEL 4

19

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

58
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

34

36%

LEVEL 4

24

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

130

35%

LEVEL 4

78

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

124

34%

LEVEL 4

85

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

25

38%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

20

34%

LEVEL 2

23

39%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

220
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

134

37%

LEVEL 4

86

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

221
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

132

36%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

47

70%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

29

53%

LEVEL 2

22

40%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

39

38%

LEVEL 4

37

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

29

31%

LEVEL 4

36

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

107

33%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

212
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

70

18%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

130

33%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

204
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

66

18%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

82

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.