PS 312 BERGEN BEACH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

146

39%

LEVEL 4

100

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

162

43%

LEVEL 4

72

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

60

35%

LEVEL 4

56

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

83

44%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

86

43%

LEVEL 4

44

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

79

42%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

75

44%

LEVEL 4

55

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

62

39%

LEVEL 4

41

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

76
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

33

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

88
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

68

46%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

18

49%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

19

48%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

125

41%

LEVEL 4

91

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

147

48%

LEVEL 4

70

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

28

41%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

244
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

144

40%

LEVEL 4

100

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

231
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

94

26%

LEVEL 3

160

44%

LEVEL 4

71

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

8

67%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

66

41%

LEVEL 4

57

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

81

47%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

80

38%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

81

41%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

243
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

144

39%

LEVEL 4

99

27%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

223
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

155

44%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.