Skip to Content
Main content

PS 222 KATHERINE R SNYDER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

99

23%

LEVEL 3

187

43%

LEVEL 4

124

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

106

24%

LEVEL 3

187

42%

LEVEL 4

119

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

167
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

92

43%

LEVEL 4

75

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

39

17%

LEVEL 3

95

42%

LEVEL 4

77

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

95

43%

LEVEL 4

49

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

92

42%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

74
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

42

45%

LEVEL 4

32

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

37

39%

LEVEL 4

26

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

90

44%

LEVEL 4

64

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

93

45%

LEVEL 4

56

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

16

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

23

40%

LEVEL 4

20

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

32

45%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

14

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

69

20%

LEVEL 3

156

45%

LEVEL 4

116

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

168

47%

LEVEL 4

114

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

39
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

23

25%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

42

48%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

304
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

91

22%

LEVEL 3

180

44%

LEVEL 4

124

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

300
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

93

23%

LEVEL 3

181

44%

LEVEL 4

119

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

94

47%

LEVEL 4

74

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

16%

LEVEL 3

100

46%

LEVEL 4

73

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

93

39%

LEVEL 4

50

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

46

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.