Skip to Content
Main content

PS 134 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

60

22%

LEVEL 3

116

42%

LEVEL 4

88

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

46

16%

LEVEL 3

144

51%

LEVEL 4

81

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

56

37%

LEVEL 4

59

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

72

51%

LEVEL 4

47

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

60

48%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

72

52%

LEVEL 4

34

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

95
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

48

41%

LEVEL 4

47

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

106
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

58

43%

LEVEL 4

48

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

42

40%

LEVEL 4

32

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

63

61%

LEVEL 4

24

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

8

57%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

13

59%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

46

19%

LEVEL 3

105

43%

LEVEL 4

83

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

35

14%

LEVEL 3

129

53%

LEVEL 4

75

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

193
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

44

18%

LEVEL 3

105

43%

LEVEL 4

88

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

217
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

33

13%

LEVEL 3

137

54%

LEVEL 4

80

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

16

46%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

23

43%

LEVEL 4

24

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

17

57%

LEVEL 4

11

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

93

42%

LEVEL 4

64

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

44

18%

LEVEL 3

127

51%

LEVEL 4

70

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

98

42%

LEVEL 4

77

33%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

197
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

38

16%

LEVEL 3

128

53%

LEVEL 4

69

28%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

29
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

18

44%

LEVEL 4

11

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.