JHS 14 SHELL BANK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

155

33%

LEVEL 2

170

37%

LEVEL 3

95

20%

LEVEL 4

44

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

154

33%

LEVEL 2

150

32%

LEVEL 3

102

22%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

100

38%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

97

38%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

26

36%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

14

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

52

42%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

56

39%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

53
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

82

45%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

74

43%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

27

35%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

23

33%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

102

28%

LEVEL 2

134

37%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

101

28%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

53

53%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

53

52%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

138
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

157
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

80

78%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

76

71%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

148

35%

LEVEL 2

156

37%

LEVEL 3

87

20%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

144

35%

LEVEL 2

132

32%

LEVEL 3

88

21%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

124

31%

LEVEL 2

149

37%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

150
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

130

32%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

96

23%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

31

48%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

24

43%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.