Skip to Content
Main content

IS 303 HERBERT S EISENBERG GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

94

19%

LEVEL 2

187

37%

LEVEL 3

142

28%

LEVEL 4

81

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

119

22%

LEVEL 2

173

32%

LEVEL 3

146

27%

LEVEL 4

98

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

62

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

59

24%

LEVEL 2

98

40%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

33

29%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

40

33%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

18

32%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

84

43%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

65

15%

LEVEL 2

154

36%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

77

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

75

16%

LEVEL 2

153

34%

LEVEL 3

134

29%

LEVEL 4

93

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

29

39%

LEVEL 2

33

44%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

44

54%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

216
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

65

14%

LEVEL 2

169

38%

LEVEL 3

135

30%

LEVEL 4

81

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

241
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

144

31%

LEVEL 4

97

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

29

54%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

45

59%

LEVEL 2

28

37%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

21

20%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

24

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

47

37%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

73

18%

LEVEL 2

157

40%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

57

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

101

25%

LEVEL 2

140

34%

LEVEL 3

99

24%

LEVEL 4

68

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

212
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

173

37%

LEVEL 3

133

28%

LEVEL 4

79

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

230
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

107

21%

LEVEL 2

163

33%

LEVEL 3

137

27%

LEVEL 4

93

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.