Skip to Content
Main content

PS 215 MORRIS H WEISS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

50

12%

LEVEL 2

96

23%

LEVEL 3

151

36%

LEVEL 4

118

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

86

23%

LEVEL 3

130

34%

LEVEL 4

116

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

74

38%

LEVEL 4

64

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

61

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

54

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

55

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

81
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

40

38%

LEVEL 4

41

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

73
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

41

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

63

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

63

35%

LEVEL 4

57

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

35

40%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

30

36%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

75

20%

LEVEL 3

142

38%

LEVEL 4

118

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

71

21%

LEVEL 3

121

36%

LEVEL 4

115

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

14

32%

LEVEL 2

21

48%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

23

48%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

262
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

75

21%

LEVEL 3

144

40%

LEVEL 4

118

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

240
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

62

19%

LEVEL 3

126

38%

LEVEL 4

114

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

24

46%

LEVEL 2

21

40%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

19

39%

LEVEL 2

24

49%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

50

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

46

37%

LEVEL 4

56

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

110

37%

LEVEL 4

68

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

242
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

84

22%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

116

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.