Skip to Content
Main content

PS 212 LADY DEBORAH MOODY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

79

24%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

113

36%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

55

34%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

58

39%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

46

44%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

65
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

41

42%

LEVEL 4

24

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

11

21%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

22

47%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

38

31%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

34

28%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

95

39%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

102

43%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

44

53%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

39

50%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

132
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

94

36%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

19

44%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

19

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

20

47%

LEVEL 4

12

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

76

27%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

130
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

69

24%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

153
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

110

38%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.