PS 238 ANNE SULLIVAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

109

34%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

110

33%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

67

40%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

15

25%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

21

35%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

26

37%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

64

37%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

60

25%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

49

65%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

49

58%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

100
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

102
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

57

63%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

58

62%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

11

27%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

16

39%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

98

36%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

104

36%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

87

33%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

22

43%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.