Skip to Content
Main content

PS 253 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

97

23%

LEVEL 3

169

41%

LEVEL 4

127

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

80

19%

LEVEL 3

178

42%

LEVEL 4

140

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

154
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

79

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

74

37%

LEVEL 4

77

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

94

45%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

104

47%

LEVEL 4

63

29%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

120
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

62

40%

LEVEL 4

58

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

143
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

81

49%

LEVEL 4

62

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

46

42%

LEVEL 4

38

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

36

35%

LEVEL 4

44

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

56

39%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

58

41%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

80

23%

LEVEL 3

137

39%

LEVEL 4

121

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

59

16%

LEVEL 3

157

43%

LEVEL 4

130

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

32

50%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

268
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

71

20%

LEVEL 3

143

41%

LEVEL 4

125

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

288
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

62

17%

LEVEL 3

150

42%

LEVEL 4

138

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

28
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

26

42%

LEVEL 3

26

42%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

28

47%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

25

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

35

49%

LEVEL 4

32

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

247
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

80

23%

LEVEL 3

145

42%

LEVEL 4

102

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

251
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

143

41%

LEVEL 4

108

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

283
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

93

23%

LEVEL 3

158

40%

LEVEL 4

125

31%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

308
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

75

19%

LEVEL 3

170

42%

LEVEL 4

138

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

11

65%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.