Skip to Content
Main content

PS 99 ISAAC ASIMOV GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

140

26%

LEVEL 2

154

29%

LEVEL 3

160

30%

LEVEL 4

84

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

119

23%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

170

33%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

85

36%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

96

36%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

80

29%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

106
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

112
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

20

39%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

26

29%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

89

20%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

153

34%

LEVEL 4

82

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

65

15%

LEVEL 2

118

27%

LEVEL 3

164

38%

LEVEL 4

86

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

51

61%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

54

64%

LEVEL 2

22

26%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

235
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

47

12%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

153

39%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

248
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

98

25%

LEVEL 3

161

41%

LEVEL 4

87

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

93

62%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

74

59%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

37

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

64

47%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

123

30%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

101

27%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

237
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

134

26%

LEVEL 2

151

29%

LEVEL 3

154

30%

LEVEL 4

83

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

251
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

112

22%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

166

33%

LEVEL 4

85

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.