PS 205 CLARION GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

84

15%

LEVEL 2

131

23%

LEVEL 3

228

40%

LEVEL 4

129

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

78

14%

LEVEL 2

134

24%

LEVEL 3

211

37%

LEVEL 4

144

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

120

43%

LEVEL 4

71

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

195
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

59

21%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

82

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

108

37%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

62

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

251
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

149

42%

LEVEL 4

102

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

252
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

66

19%

LEVEL 3

146

42%

LEVEL 4

106

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

43

39%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

30

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

342
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

101

21%

LEVEL 3

213

43%

LEVEL 4

129

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

101

21%

LEVEL 3

204

42%

LEVEL 4

141

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

36

44%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

42

49%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

339
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

84

19%

LEVEL 3

212

47%

LEVEL 4

127

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

339
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

95

21%

LEVEL 3

196

42%

LEVEL 4

143

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

55

46%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

50

48%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

32

17%

LEVEL 3

82

43%

LEVEL 4

65

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

67

37%

LEVEL 4

66

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

146

38%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

144

37%

LEVEL 4

78

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

347
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

76

14%

LEVEL 2

126

23%

LEVEL 3

220

40%

LEVEL 4

127

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

344
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

72

13%

LEVEL 2

128

24%

LEVEL 3

205

38%

LEVEL 4

139

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.