Skip to Content
Main content

PS 176 OVINGTON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

478
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

94

13%

LEVEL 2

170

23%

LEVEL 3

283

38%

LEVEL 4

195

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

440
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

99

14%

LEVEL 2

157

23%

LEVEL 3

268

39%

LEVEL 4

172

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

260
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

156

43%

LEVEL 4

104

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

218
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

76

23%

LEVEL 3

124

37%

LEVEL 4

94

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

218
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

106

28%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

91

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

222
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

144

39%

LEVEL 4

78

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

361
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

98

20%

LEVEL 3

206

41%

LEVEL 4

155

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

335
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

94

20%

LEVEL 3

189

40%

LEVEL 4

146

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

25

31%

LEVEL 4

20

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

26

38%

LEVEL 4

14

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

454
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

55

8%

LEVEL 2

143

22%

LEVEL 3

265

41%

LEVEL 4

189

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

411
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

64

10%

LEVEL 2

138

23%

LEVEL 3

244

40%

LEVEL 4

167

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

39

43%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

35

42%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

420
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

121

21%

LEVEL 3

237

41%

LEVEL 4

183

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

420
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

44

8%

LEVEL 2

118

20%

LEVEL 3

249

43%

LEVEL 4

171

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

56

34%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

55

48%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

36

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

35

40%

LEVEL 4

31

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

415
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

88

13%

LEVEL 2

149

23%

LEVEL 3

256

39%

LEVEL 4

159

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

374
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

95

16%

LEVEL 2

140

23%

LEVEL 3

233

38%

LEVEL 4

141

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

449
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

83

12%

LEVEL 2

156

23%

LEVEL 3

267

39%

LEVEL 4

182

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

416
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

95

15%

LEVEL 2

142

22%

LEVEL 3

251

38%

LEVEL 4

165

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

29
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

11

20%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.