Skip to Content
Main content

PS 105 BLYTHEBOURNE (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

372
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

117

17%

LEVEL 2

214

30%

LEVEL 3

234

33%

LEVEL 4

138

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

105

16%

LEVEL 2

166

25%

LEVEL 3

265

40%

LEVEL 4

128

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

121

41%

LEVEL 4

68

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

198
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

63

17%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

78

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

67

18%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

144

39%

LEVEL 4

60

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

344
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

102

16%

LEVEL 2

182

29%

LEVEL 3

213

34%

LEVEL 4

131

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

370
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

87

15%

LEVEL 2

143

24%

LEVEL 3

247

41%

LEVEL 4

123

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

367
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

90

14%

LEVEL 2

199

30%

LEVEL 3

230

35%

LEVEL 4

137

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

76

12%

LEVEL 2

156

25%

LEVEL 3

261

42%

LEVEL 4

128

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

27

57%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

29

67%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

346
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

139

27%

LEVEL 3

210

41%

LEVEL 4

136

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

371
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

96

19%

LEVEL 3

243

49%

LEVEL 4

128

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

90

47%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

79

46%

LEVEL 2

70

41%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

19

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

30

46%

LEVEL 4

15

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

331
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

111

18%

LEVEL 2

192

30%

LEVEL 3

212

33%

LEVEL 4

119

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

348
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

99

17%

LEVEL 2

152

25%

LEVEL 3

235

39%

LEVEL 4

113

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.